Back to 1 April 1996 | Forward to 11 May 1996 |
The curious thing about this situation is that the Legler didn't have a guaranteed contract next year; however, the money was guaranteed. In other words, if he had been a bust last year, the Bullets could have cut him, though they would still owe the money. It's unclear whether he would have counted against the cap next year (my guess in no). Welcome back, Tim! Heal quickly!
wtf 1 June 1996
To Top of Page...
One interesting point from Nash: the teams that sign players in July is going to overpay for the players (to prevent the players from leaving or to lure the players from another team; the teams that sign players in September, when cap money is tight, tend to underpay for the players. Keep that in mind.
Looking at some of the Bullets' free agents (George Michael's estimate)--Juwan Howard is going to demand $13M per year; Robert Pack is looking for $3M per year in a new deal; Jim McIlvaine will probably demand at least $1.5M per year.
wtf 28 May 1996
To Top of Page...
Over the course of the next several days, it became that, while the Bullets organization may deny a decision had been made, Nash was, more than likely, going to be fired. He'd done somethings well and done some poor things. He found gems in Gheorghe Muresan and Jim McIlvaine (and eventually Brent Price) in the second round. He stepped up and made the deal for Chris Webber, and eventually unloaded problem children like Rex Chapman and Don MacLean.
But he stepped on a lot of toes along the way, hurting a lot of people's "feelings" (I have no other way of putting it). We all know about the snubs during and after the negotiations with Juwan Howard. (Howard's agent David Falk vows to make sure the Bullets don't forget.) There were also reports of Nash pissing off Webber with his demands that he be on the bench in street clothes for all games. (Not a bad demand for your $6M player, but where was Mark Price, a $3M man, all season? Doing his laundry? Where's the consistency in the demands?) I also don't think Washington Sports president Susan O'Malley, the highly trusted lieutenant to owner Abe Pollin, ever forgave Nash for being the driving force behind the 1994 firing of coach Wes Unseld.
Then there is Rex Chapman's comment after the Howard-Askins fight earlier this season (I'm paraphrasing)--"I was in that pile to see if I could find John Nash in there." While I'm no Chapman lover, Nash had become a liability for the organization. He had angered more than a few players with his negotiating and interpersonal style. At the very least, he often seemed brutal or downright dishonest (at times). (Chapman claims the Bullets reneged on a contract they had offered, among other claims.) I can come to no other conclusion.
The personal reasons for leaving, besides facing being forced out, may also include an upcoming divorce that he is supposedly facing. The Bullets will pay him for the final year of his contract, although by June, it became obvious that he was being considered for GM positions in New Jersey, Philadelphia and Dallas. He also tried out for a broadcasting role next season. His options are numerous, at moment. They just won't be with the Washington Bullets.
wtf 17 June 1996
To Top of Page...
I don't know how long Wes' contract is for (as confirmed in mid-June, 5 years). His early orders of business are to call coach Jim Lynam (who is seeking, and received?) a contract extension (even though his friend, John Nash, resigned); call Webber and Howard, to make sure things are okay; and call Howard's agent, David Falk, who is representing a lot of the Bullets' future with his upcoming negotiations.
I'm not sold on Wes as GM. Abe seems to want to run this organization as a family, with people he can trust. Wes (and Washington Sports president Susan O'Malley, and previous GM Bob Ferry) had trusting relationships with Abe, even when things were rocky. And it seems his working relationship with John Nash had been poisoned, whether from willful intervention (on O'Malley's part) or not. But Abe didn't even try interviewing outside the Bullets organization, where there are several well respected personnel men around the league looking for that GM role, which would have been (IMO) the smart move, even if you still wanted to hire Wes. It's unclear whether Wes will have the right stuff to do the job.
The other negative I see is the perception of the Bullets as an organization that limits itself to the familiar and the trusted. I'm not sure if this is a good or bad impression; does this mean that they're cheap, or does it mean that they reward hard work and good service? It's this concern that I have at the back of my head. It's probably irrational, but it lingers nonetheless.
Here's wishing the best of luch to Wes in his new role, and may he be as successful as he was as a player, and not as a coach.
wtf 17 June 1996
To Top of Page...
wtf 17 June 1996
To Top of Page...
Eighteen players received votes. George McCloud of Dallas was second in the balloting with 23 votes and Cleveland teammates Danny Ferry and Terrell Brandon shared third place with six votes each. Other players receiving votes include Terry Murray of Toronto (4), Brian Williams of the Los Angeles Clippers (4), Elden Campbell of the Los Angeles Lakers (3), Shawn Bradley and Chris Childs, both of New Jersey (2), Alan Houston of Detroit (2), Bobby Phills of Cleveland (2), Dennis Scott of Orlando (2), David Wesley of Boston (2), Greg Anthony of Vancouver (1), Vinny Del Negro of San Antonio (1), Matt Geiger of Charlotte (1), Juwan Howard of Washington (1) and Jayson Williams of New Jersey (1).
What's interesting to note is that Muresan finished second last season in the Most Improved Player voting (behind Dana Barros), yet he's still improving enough to win the voting this year. And the league is noticing. Way to go, Ghitza!
wtf 1 June 1996
To Top of Page...
In Wes' words, the Bullets' GM represents Abe Pollin in all negotiations. Abe has to approve all deals. So, in many ways, past negotiating stances are probably very representative of what Abe Pollin believed was appropriate.
Wes has already talked to Juwan's agent, David Falk. The dialogue will come later. But he still has to talk with Jim Lynam about the future of several players on the Bullets (e.g., Calbert Cheaney, Rasheed Wallace, Mitchell Butler, the PG situation).
wtf 28 May 1996
To Top of Page...
Let me state first that I HATE this idea. Kenny Anderson is not the point guard the Bullets need. He can't shoot (career shooting percentage below 40%), he's out of control (turnovers average well over 3 per game), and he can't play a lick of man-to-man defense (at least, I've never seen him do it). But hey, if that's what you like in a player, fine, sign him!
Robert Pack is a better shooter than Kenny Anderson, plays MUCH better defense, also turns the ball over, but here's the key--HE WON'T COST AS MUCH! His agent, David Falk, is quoted as saying Anderson will cost at least $7M per season (at least, that's the demand--I don't think he's worth it). And the Bullets haven't had a good time negotiating with Falk recently. (See this related story--coming soon.)
Plus, I don't understand this renouncing the rights of three players who will be unrestricted free agents. The only thing I can think of is that, to fit under the salary "cap," the Bullets would have to renounce their right to resign their own free agents for whatever they offer. In other words, the three players are truly unrestricted and cannot look to the Bullets to overpay just to keep him. Anyone who understands this part of the collective bargaining agreement, let me know.
In summary, just say no--NO KENNY ANDERSON!
wtf 1 June 1996
To Top of Page...